NLM Gateway
A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health
Your Entrance to
Resources from the
National Library of Medicine
    Home      Term Finder      Limits/Settings      Search Details      History      My Locker        About      Help      FAQ    
Skip Navigation Side Barintended for web crawlers only

Comparison of electrophoretic karyotyping and random amplified polymorphic DNA typing methods for Candida albicans: inter and intra patient strain discrimination.

Riederer K, Barczak J, Ramanathan J, Khatib R; American Society for Microbiology. General Meeting.

Abstr Gen Meet Am Soc Microbiol. 1999 May 30-Jun 3; 99: 320 (abstract no. F-120).

St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI.

Electrophoretic karyotyping (EK) is a useful tool for typing C. Albicans (CA). PCR based methods such as Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) are nowadays frequently used because of a quicker turn around time. The optimal typing method remains undetermined due to the lack of a gold standard. We elected to perform a direct comparison of these two methods to determine the ability to distinguish genetically diverse CA strains from different patients as well as potentially genetically related intra-patient strains. 162 colonies of CA, consisting of 9 colonies from each of the 18 inpatient stools cultured on Inhibitory Mold Agar, were included in the study. EK was done using CHEF Genomic EDNA Plug Kits and the CHEF-DRIII (BioRad). For RAPD, DNA was extracted using the QIAamp Tissue Kit (WIAGEN) then analyzed with Ready-To- Go RAPD Analysis Beads utilizing 76 primers (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Inter-patient analysis of the predominant strain showed that EK disclosed 9 karyotypes whereas RAPD detected 17 composites. Intra-patient strain differences were detected by EK and RAPD in 25/162 and 22/162 instances respectively, and by both methods in 11/162 instances. Concordant results were noted consistently when patient colonies were genetically identical and when differ- ences in band patterns were major (> or = 3 bands). Discordant results were found only in subtle strain differences (< or = 2 bands). These results show that RAPD, utilizing the 6 primers, yielded more unique patterns among genetically unrelated strains when compared to EK (16 vs 5 of the 18 patients, p<0.001) and that both methods were comparable in detecting intra-patient genetic differences. EK remains a suitable method for typing CA. However, RAPD has the advantage of producing a larger array of band patterns and the ability to form composite types by using multiple primers, resulting in greater genetic discrimina- tion between patient samples as well as a faster turn around time.

Publication Types:
  • Meeting Abstracts
Keywords:
  • Candida albicans
  • DNA Fingerprinting
  • Genetic Screening
  • Humans
  • Karyotyping
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique
  • genetics
  • methods
Other ID:
  • 20712183
UI: 102195713

From Meeting Abstracts




Contact Us
U.S. National Library of Medicine |  National Institutes of Health |  Health & Human Services
Privacy |  Copyright |  Accessibility |  Freedom of Information Act |  USA.gov