NLM Gateway
A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health
Your Entrance to
Resources from the
National Library of Medicine
    Home      Term Finder      Limits/Settings      Search Details      History      My Locker        About      Help      FAQ    
Skip Navigation Side Barintended for web crawlers only

Adherence to universal precautions by HCWs in an inner-city emergency department with high HIV-1 prevalence among patients.

Kelen G, DiGiovanna T, Kalainov D, Bisson L, Scott C; International Conference on AIDS.

Int Conf AIDS. 1989 Jun 4-9; 5: 63 (abstract no. W.A.O.4).

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

OBJECTIVE: To assess adherence to "Universal Precautions" (UP) among health care workers (HCWs) in an emergency department (ED) with high prevalence (6.0%) of HIV-1 among its patient population. METHODS: We prospectively observed 129 HCWs performing 1274 interventions on 151 consecutive patients requiring rapid interventions. Institution-wide and departmental instructional sessions on UP were held for HCWs throughout the year prior to the initiation of the study. Interventions were classified as major (42.5%) or minor (57.4%) depending on the potential for exposure. RESULTS: Overall adherence was adequate during 16.5% of major interventions and 64.8% of minor interventions (p less than .05). During minor interventions, adherence was the same for trauma presentations (62.9%) and non-trauma presentations (67.0%) (p greater than .05). However, in the presence of profuse bleeding, adherence during minor interventions declined to 19.7% in traumatic presentations (p less than .05) and 0.0% in non-trauma presentations (p less than .05). During major procedures, adherence was 34.0% with traumatic presentations and 0.8% with non-trauma presentations (p less than .05). The overall adherence rate for HCWs was: Residents 58%; Attendings 38%; Consultants 43%; Nursing staff 44%; Paramedics 8%; X-ray technicians 14%; and Housekeeping 91%. When precautions were inadequate, surgical masks were used least (22.4%), followed by eye protection (45.0%), gowns (49.6%) and gloves (73.7%). A questionnaire administered following the study period revealed that the most common reasons given for not adhering to UP was lack of time to put on protective materials (47%), and interference in performance of procedures (33%). CONCLUSION: HCWs in this setting are not taking adequate precautions. Other strategies for implementing Universal Precautions need to be developed.

Publication Types:
  • Meeting Abstracts
Keywords:
  • Allied Health Personnel
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Gloves, Protective
  • HIV-1
  • Health Personnel
  • Hospital Departments
  • Humans
  • Masks
  • Protective Clothing
  • Trauma Centers
  • Universal Precautions
  • injuries
Other ID:
  • 00009589
UI: 102175989

From Meeting Abstracts




Contact Us
U.S. National Library of Medicine |  National Institutes of Health |  Health & Human Services
Privacy |  Copyright |  Accessibility |  Freedom of Information Act |  USA.gov